The Observer: British firms escape abuse lawsuits
“One of the allegations that is still likely to get a hearing is a high-profile case against Shell that claims that the oil giant colluded in Nigeria’s brutal oppression of Ogoni villagers”
Conal Walsh
Sunday July 4, 2004
Barclays, BP and other British companies facing allegations of human rights abuses in apartheid-era South Africa are set to avoid legal action following a US Supreme Court ruling.
The ruling, delivered last week, curtails the scope of the Alien Tort Claims Act, an 18th-century US law under which companies can be sued in the American courts for human rights breaches committed anywhere in the world.
Lawyers believe that most of the apartheid claims will now be dismissed because the abuses they allege – including exploiting black labour and lending money to South Africa’s government in the 1970s and 1980s – will no longer be judged serious enough to trigger the act.
One of the judges behind the ruling, David Souter, singled out the apartheid cases as being among those that may no longer be eligible. NatWest, Standard Chartered, Anglo American, IBM and others have also been sued by black former workers. All the multinationals deny the allegations.
The Supreme Court’s move follows intense lobbying by the Bush administration, the International Chamber of Commerce and the British government. Other cases that may now be dismissed include a lawsuit claiming that Coca-Cola was involved in anti-union violence in Colombia.
However, the ruling leaves room for cases accusing corporations of the most serious human rights violations, such as genocide, murder, torture and slavery. Amnesty International expressed relief that the decision had upheld the act’s ‘core principles’.
One of the allegations that is still likely to get a hearing is a high-profile case against Shell that claims that the oil giant colluded in Nigeria’s brutal oppression of Ogoni villagers in the early Nineties.
Unocal, the Californian energy firm, is also facing claims of severe abuses in Colombia.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,1253235,00.html
This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.
Royal Dutch Shell conspired directly with Hitler, financed the Nazi Party, was anti-Semitic and sold out its own Dutch Jewish employees to the Nazis. Shell had a close relationship with the Nazis during and after the reign of Sir Henri Deterding, an ardent Nazi, and the founder and decades long leader of the Royal Dutch Shell Group. His burial ceremony, which had all the trappings of a state funeral, was held at his private estate in Mecklenburg, Germany. The spectacle (photographs below) included a funeral procession led by a horse drawn funeral hearse with senior Nazis officials and senior Royal Dutch Shell directors in attendance, Nazi salutes at the graveside, swastika banners on display and wreaths and personal tributes from Adolf Hitler and Reichsmarschall, Hermann Goring. Deterding was an honored associate and supporter of Hitler and a personal friend of Goring.
Deterding was the guest of Hitler during a four day summit meeting at Berchtesgaden. Sir Henri and Hitler both had ambitions on Russian oil fields. Only an honored personal guest would be rewarded with a private four day meeting at Hitler’s mountain top retreat.
IN JULY 2007, MR BILL CAMPBELL (ABOVE, A RETIRED GROUP AUDITOR OF SHELL INTERNATIONAL SENT AN EMAIL TO EVERY UK MP AND MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS: 
MORE DETAILS:
A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
