June 27th, 2004:

Comments are off for this post

Taipei Times: Former chairman of Royal/Dutch Shell gets giant payout: ‘after an accounting scandal’

SEVERANCE PACKAGE: Sir Philip Watts received £1.06 million after he stepped down from his post at the oil giant after an accounting scandal

Sunday, Jun 27, 2004,Page 11

The Royal Dutch/Shell Group’s former chairman, Sir Philip Watts, received a severance package worth £1.06 million (US$1.93 million), the amount he would have earned had he stayed on until retirement, the company said on Friday.

Watts was asked to step down in March, after an internal investigation found that the company had overstated its oil and gas reserves estimates for several years. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Embattled Shell braces for shareholder showdown

Jun 27th, 2004

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

ChannelNewsAsia.com: Embattled Shell braces for shareholder showdown

“officers and directors of these interconnected companies have hidden behind an opaque and complicated corporate structure to falsify proved oil and gas reserves for nearly 10 years”

27 June 04

LONDON : The management of Royal Dutch/Shell is bracing for a showdown with angry shareholders this week over the oil giant’s energy reserves scandal.

The Anglo-Dutch group is facing calls for changes to its governance and ownership structure, under which London-based Shell owns 40 percent of the group and Netherlands-domiciled Royal Dutch Petroleum Company holds 60 percent.

The two companies are to hold what promise to be stormy dual annual shareholder meetings in London and The Hague on Monday. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Shell board braced for revolt

Jun 27th, 2004

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Mail on Sunday: Shell board braced for revolt

Patrick Tooher,

27 June 2004

SHELL faces a major shareholder revolt at its annual meeting tomorrow that could see nine directors, including chairman Jeroen van der Veer, kicked off the Dutch half of the board at the embattled oil giant.

Institutional Shareholder Services, the world’s largest proxy voting agency, is urging clients to back a motion that amounts to a vote of no confidence in the Royal Dutch board over its handling of the oil reserves fiasco.

Financial Mail has established that Dutch investors who typically support incumbent management and have been blocking corporate reforms, own less than 15% of the shares. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Shell told to hurry up on transparency

Jun 27th, 2004

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Sunday Times: Shell told to hurry up on transparency

Lucinda Kemeny

June 27, 2004

INSTITUTIONAL investors will unite to urge Royal Dutch/ Shell, the embattled oil giant, to speed up its review of corporate governance at a showdown annual meeting tomorrow.

Earlier this month the company bowed to demands for clarity and released details of a five-member governance review team, set up after repeated calls from shareholders.

Although shareholder groups welcomed the development, Lord Oxburgh, non-executive chairman, and Malcolm Brinded, managing director of London-listed Shell, can expect a stormy meeting. Investors have been further incensed by the oil group’s announcement on Friday that it is paying Sir Philip Watts, its sacked chairman, £1.06m — five times his contractual entitlement. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Shell heads for shareholder defeat on director responsibility

Jun 27th, 2004

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

The Sunday Telegraph: Shell heads for shareholder defeat on director responsibility

By Sylvia Pfeifer (Filed: 27/06/2004)

Royal Dutch faces an investor defeat if it fails to withdraw two key motions asking shareholders to absolve directors from responsibility for the oil giant’s recent troubles.

The Telegraph has taken soundings among leading shareholders in Royal Dutch, the Netherlands-based arm of Royal Dutch/Shell. These reveal that many intend either to vote against the motions or to abstain. None contacted by this newspaper said they would vote in favour.

About 25 per cent of Royal Dutch stock is owned by US-based investors. They are understood to be following the recommendation of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), the influential proxy voting service. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

The Observer: Ethical funds dump Shell shares

Jun 27th, 2004

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

The Observer: Ethical funds dump Shell shares

Nick Mathiason and Oliver Morgan

Sunday June 27, 2004

Leading institutions are selling shares in Shell over concerns about the way the company deals with environmental issues associated with its activities in Africa, the United States and Sakhalin Island off the Russian coast.

As the oil giant braces itself for a stormy annual general meeting tomorrow, two leading fund managers representing blue-chip City institutions have confirmed that they have ditched all their Shell shares.

Socially responsible investment (SRI) funds belonging to Investec Henderson Crosthwaite and Morley Fund Management have sold all Shell shares in recent months. The move is significant, because SRI decisions increasingly affect mainstream analysts’ investment recommendations. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

The Observer: A pearl in Shell?

Jun 27th, 2004

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

The Observer: A pearl in Shell?

Oliver Morgan

Sunday June 27, 2004

With so much ink spilled over the enigma that is oil giant Shell this year, investors could be forgiven for wondering what to do.

A sage City gent recounted last week how he had bought Shell shares in the spring at around 350p and intended to stay in there until they reached a fiver. Wise? Well, the sector has been soaring away on the high oil price and record second-quarter results are expected next month.

Shell – which has its AGM tomorrow – may take years to close the gap in fundamentals between itself and peers BP and Exxon, but that’s not the point just now. A significant part of the problem comes down to what analysts call ’emotional’ discount – effectively incomprehension and irritation at the company’s obfuscation. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

The Observer: Shell shock

Jun 27th, 2004

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

The Observer: Shell shock

Nick Mathiason
Sunday June 27, 2004

Execs at Shell will be praying for fine weather tomorrow. The accident-prone company’s AGM is in the morning in Docklands with a higher-than-usual quota of fund managers intending to turn up with awkward questions. With a journey time of just two hours from the Excel centre to the centre court, a rain-free day should entice troublemakers away well before chairman Lord Oxburgh runs out of prepared answers, a point rammed home to Cheapside by several of the City’s finest. But his lordship can expect extra vitriol if it rains. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Watchdog lawyer sues Shell, execs over reserves

Jun 27th, 2004

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

Economic Times: Watchdog lawyer sues Shell, execs over reserves

Posted 27 June 04

NEW YORK: The army of lawyers swarming around Royal Dutch/Shell Group, which touched off a collapse in its stock price after it admitted inflating proved reserves, has just been joined by a well-known veteran.

Securities lawyer William Lerach, a lead player in many of the biggest shareholder class action suits of the past two decades, on Friday filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit against Shell and its executives in a New Jersey state court.

The suit on behalf of the UNITE National Retirement Fund and the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund — alleges Shell directors and auditors failed to properly monitor company management, which ran afoul of new Sarbanes-Oxley corporate reform rules in the United States. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Shareholders to strike new blow against Shell directors

Jun 27th, 2004

by John Donovan.

Comments are off for this post

The Independent: Shareholders to strike new blow against Shell directors

By Tim Webb

27 June 2004

Up to a quarter of Shell’s shareholders will deliver a crushing vote of no confidence in the Anglo-Dutch oil giant’s management tomorrow.

Shareholders have warned that a “significant minority” will either abstain from or vote against the second resolution at the annual general meeting of the group’s Dutch arm in the Hague.

This asks them to approve the 2003 annual accounts. Under Dutch listing rules, Royal Dutch must ask shareholders to “discharge directors and managing directors of their responsibility in respect of their management for the year 2003”. read more

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

DISCLAIMER

This is not a Shell website. That fact should be abundantly plain from the overall content of this home page and our sister Shell-focussed websites, including shellnazihistory.com. Click on the Disclaimer link at top of this page for more information. You Can Be Sure Shell does not endorse or approve of this website. There are no subscription charges nor do we solicit or accept donations. It is an entirely free to use website drawing attention to the negative side of Shell while also publishing positive news about the company. The Shell logo image with the white text used on this website, as per the above example, is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. It can be found on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Our shellenergy.website publishes Shell Energy customer complaints posted on Trustpilot where there is an ample supply. Use this link for Shell’s own website.

NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL

Royal Dutch Shell conspired directly with Hitler, financed the Nazi Party, was anti-Semitic and sold out its own Dutch Jewish employees to the Nazis. Shell had a close relationship with the Nazis during and after the reign of Sir Henri Deterding, an ardent Nazi, and the founder and decades long leader of the Royal Dutch Shell Group. His burial ceremony, which had all the trappings of a state funeral, was held at his private estate in Mecklenburg, Germany. The spectacle (photographs below) included a funeral procession led by a horse drawn funeral hearse with senior Nazis officials and senior Royal Dutch Shell directors in attendance, Nazi salutes at the graveside, swastika banners on display and wreaths and personal tributes from Adolf Hitler and Reichsmarschall, Hermann Goring. Deterding was an honored associate and supporter of Hitler and a personal friend of Goring.

Deterding was the guest of Hitler during a four day summit meeting at Berchtesgaden. Sir Henri and Hitler both had ambitions on Russian oil fields. Only an honored personal guest would be rewarded with a private four day meeting at Hitler’s mountain top retreat.

MORE INFORMATION
Shell appeased and collaborated with the Nazis. The oil giant instructed its employees in the Netherlands to complete a form giving particulars about their descent, which for some, amounted to a self-declared death warrant. Shell used slave labor and was a close business partner in Germany of I.G. Farben, the notorious Nazi run chemical giant that also used slave labor and supplied the Zyklon-B gas used during the Holocaust to exterminate millions of people, including children. Shell continued the partnership with the Nazis in the years after the retirement of Sir Henri and even after his death. It was money generated on Shell forecourts around the world, profiteering from cartel oil prices, that funded the Nazi party and saved it from financial collapse. Evidence about Shell's Nazi connections can be found in extracts from "A History of Royal Dutch Shell" Volumes 1 and 2 authored by historians paid by Shell, who had unrestricted access to Shell archives. There are 67 pages in total, so takes some time to download.

Photograph (full size here) shows a Swastika flag flying at the head office of Royal Dutch Petroleum, 30 Carel van Bylandtlaan, The Hague, during the Nazi occupation of the in World War II (From Image Database Hague Municipal)

Sir Henri Deterding, the founder of the Royal Dutch Shell Group - known as "The Most Powerful Man in the World" - who became an ardent Nazi and financial supporter of Hitler and the Nazi party.

SHELL IP PIRACY

Reading between the lines in various legal documents, it seems that the allegations are that after the technology in question had been disclosed to a Shell company in the USA, the information was passed to Shell in the Netherlands in breach of confidentiality. And Royal Dutch Shell subsequently exploited the technology without payment or credit to the company holding the rights; Newton Research Partners. The inference seems to be that Twister B.V. was founded by Shell partly on trade secrets stolen from Bloom/Newton.

For more information read:

ARTICLE: Shell in the US courts again for alleged theft of trade secrets: 20 June 2014

ARTICLE: Twister B.V. by name, Twister by nature?: 09 August 2014

WEBSITE INFORMATION

DISCLAIMER: This is not a Shell website nor is it officially endorsed by or affiliated with Royal Dutch Shell Plc. Originally co-founded by the late Alfred Donovan and his son John, it is now operated by John, Shell's "No.1 Enemy", aided by an expert team, with invaluable support from retired Shell senior executives and officials as guest contributors and leaked information from Shell insiders.

(JOHN DONOVAN, WEBSITE OWNER)
For nearly a decade, we have operated globally under the Royal Dutch Shell Plc top level domain name, dealing on Shell’s reluctant behalf with job applications, business proposals, Shell pension enquiries, shareholder enquiries, complaints, invitations to speak at conferences, an approach from the Dutch Defence Ministry and even terrorist threats. All meant for Shell. Prospect magazine has aptly described this website as being:"An open wound for Shell":
WIPO proceedings by Shell to seize the domain name failed.
NO SUBSCRIPTION CHARGES: All of our watchdog activities monitoring Royal Dutch Shell, including operating this website, are carried out on a non-profit basis. Any advertising revenues generated are used to recover and/or defray operational costs. We are a news aggregator and original content website. All information is available free for educational and research purposes.
SHELL TACIT ENDORSEMENT: WHAT A WELL INFORMED SHELL OFFICIAL SAID ABOUT US: "John and Alfred Donovan well known in UK/Hague. They perceive Shell played them and so have made it their mission to embarrass, belittle and criticize Shell, which they do quite well. Their website, royaldutchshellplc.com is an excellent source of group news and comment and I recommend it far above what our own group internal comms puts out."
WARNING TO SHELL EMPLOYEES: Shell Global Affairs Security "CAS") is spying on Shell employees globally trying to trace who is visiting, posting, or leaking information to this website from Shell premises. Threats, including death threats, have allegedly been made against conscience driven Shell whistleblowers supplying us with information. The worlds biggest leak of employee details as part of a claimed corporate revolution by 116 Shell employees, suggest the espionage operation, threats and draconian litigation have not been entirely successful in cutting off the supply of information to this website. The insider leaks had already cost Shell billions on the Sakhalin Energy project and the loss of SEIC Deputy Chairman, David Greer.
We publish our own carefully researched articles about Shell e.g. "How Royal Dutch Shell saved Hitler and the Nazi Party".
MEDIA COVERAGE: Prospect Magazine, The Sunday Times, and The Guardian, have all published major articles about us: "Rise of the Gripe Site";"Two men and a website mount vendetta against Shell' and "92-year-old's website leaves oil giant Shell-shocked”.
SHELL PETROL STATION images displayed in the website header panel are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Information on copyright issues here.
John Donovan can be contacted at [email protected]

BILL CAMPBELL WHISTLEBLOWER EMAIL TO MP’S

IN JULY 2007, MR BILL CAMPBELL (ABOVE, A RETIRED GROUP AUDITOR OF SHELL INTERNATIONAL SENT AN EMAIL TO EVERY UK MP AND MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS:

THIS IS WHAT IT SAID:

Subject: This could be the most important whistleblower email you have ever received.

Some unfortunate Royal Dutch Shell workers have already lost their lives. More lives are at stake.

My name is Bill Campbell. I am a former Group Auditor of Shell International. I am writing to you on a matter of conscience in an effort to avert the inevitability of another major accident in the North Sea. The consequences could potentially impact on families in many constituencies, including your own.

As Royal Dutch Shell and the Health & Safety Executive would acknowledge, I am an expert on safety matters relating to offshore oil and gas platforms. In 1999, I was appointed by Shell to lead a safety audit on the Brent Bravo platform. The audit revealed a platform management culture that basically gave a higher priority to production than the safety of Shell employees. To our astonishment we discovered that a "Touch F*** All" policy was in place. Worse still, safety records were routinely falsified and repairs bodged.

I personally brought the shocking situation to the attention of senior management including Malcolm Brinded, the then Managing Director of Shell Exploration & Production. I revealed that ESDV leak-off tests were purposely falsified, not once but many times and that Brent Bravo platform management had admitted responsibility for the dangerous practices being followed. In response to my team ringing alarm bells, management pledged to rectify the serious problems which had been uncovered.

When I later complained that the pledges were not being kept, I was removed from my oversight function.

Four years later, a massive gas leak occurred on the platform. Two workers lost their lives. I have no doubt at all that the inaction of the relevant Asset Manager, the General Manager, the Oil Director and Malcolm Brinded, contributed in some part to the unlawful killing of two persons on Brent Bravo in September 2003.

Shell subsequently pleaded guilty to breaches of the HSE regulations and a record-breaking £900,000 fine was imposed. I thought this would bring about a real change in policy to put the emphasis on safety.

Unfortunately I was wrong. Although I supplied the evidence related to 1999, and the fact that there had been a collapse in controls of integrity from 1999 to 2003 on all 16 of Shell's North Sea offshore installations covered in a post fatality integrity review to the HSE for review by the Procurator Fiscal, none of this evidence was presented before the Sheriff at the subsequent Inquiry. The situation is explained in a letter to the Procurator Fiscal and the Sheriff (on 24th February 2007).

Shell management has engaged in spin to try to pretend that it is getting to grips with its safety problem. However, its atrocious safety record - the worst in the North Sea in terms of accidental deaths and absolute number of enforcement actions – tells a different story. This fact has resulted in a number of newspaper articles.

I have had meetings with senior Shell people including its CEO Mr. Jeroen van der Veer. I regret to say that I have found him to be economical with the truth. He prefers to support cover-up and deceit rather than confronting the underlying problems. Brinded is now Executive Director of Shell Exploration & Production. He believes in burying evidence.

My family and friends would probably prefer me to give up on this matter and enjoy my retirement after so many years working for Shell.

However, by writing to every MP in the UK, no one can ever say that I did not do my best to avert an inevitable further major accident event in the North Sea. When it happens (I pray that I am wrong) I will make this warning communication available to the media together with the vast amount of evidence in my possession.

At least my conscience is clear. I have done everything possible to ring the alarm bells about Shell management and its unscrupulous attitude to the safety of its employees.

Yours sincerely
Bill Campbell

ENDS

(Malcolm Brinded and Jeroen van der Veer are no longer with Shell. The Oil Director referred to in the email is Chris Finlayson, who left Shell to become Chief Executive of British Gas before being fired - his photo immediately below)

THE BRENT BRAVO SCANDAL
BRENT BRAVO: THE EVIDENCE ASSEMBLED BY BILL CAMPBELL

BILL CAMPBELL EVIDENCE BUNDLES A to F - June 2012

BILL CAMPBELL EVIDENCE BUNDLES A to F CONTINUED - June 2012

by John Donovan

Displayed below are some of the spectacular promotional campaigns my company Don Marketing created for Shell in the 1980s and 1990s. This was before the series of SIX high court actions we brought against Shell for stealing ideas (4) and for defamation (2) - all settled by Shell. This website is a permanent response by me to the malicious underhand tactics, including treachery, espionage and intimidation, used by Shell during and after the bouts of litigation. More information is printed at the foot of this column.

MORE DETAILS: After a solicitor acting for Shell threatened to make the litigation "drawn out and difficult" with the intention of draining the resources of a financially weaker opponent, my late father (Alfred Donovan) and I decided to mount a wide-ranging campaign as a counter-measure. We jointly founded the Shell Corporate Conscience Pressure Group, which nearly 15% of Shell UK retailers joined. We regularly conducted ethical surveys involving up to 1500 Shell petrol stations. All responses were opened and authenticated by an independent solicitor who supplied Affidavits confirming the results. In whole page announcements in trade magazines (examples above) we challenged Shell to commission and publish the resuits of independent research asking the same questions and offering respondents GUARANTEED anonymity. Shell never took up the invitation. Instead it asked the UK Advertising Standards Authority to investigate our Shell surveys. No problems were found. The head-cut image of Alfred Donovan appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.

SHELL CONTROVERSIES

selection of memorable warnings/articles/images associated with the controversial track record of Royal Dutch Shell.

WARNING: DO NOT DISCLOSE YOUR IDEAS TO SHELL GameChanger OR SHELL Ideas360 WITHOUT TAKING EVERY POSSIBLE PRECAUTION. Shell management has ample funds to pay for intellectual property but prefers to steal it from small businesses and in our experience, gives its full backing to dishonest managers willing to do its bidding. We have sued Shell repeatedly in the High Court for the theft of our Intellectual Property. It is doubtful if anyone can match our dire experience in dealing with this ruthless unscrupulous serial poacher of other parties ideas. Expect threats, legal machinations and sinister action from Shell and its spooks if you object to having your ideas stolen.

LINKS TO SOME RELATED ARTICLES:

ARTICLE: Shell in the US courts again for alleged theft of trade secrets: 20 June 2014

ARTICLE: Shell GameChanger - Scam, or Genuine Game Changer?: 10 June 2014

ARTICLE: Is it safe to disclose ideas to Shell GameChanger?: 7 June 2014

ARTICLE: Royal Dutch Shell plc Brings Crowdsourcing to the Energy Markets: 20 April 2014

ARTICLE: High Court papers unveil ‘secret’ Shell writ losses: 23 April 1998

ARTICLE: Another warning to inventors of the alleged dangers when dealing with Shell : 12 March 2008

ARTICLE: Shell in deepwater, accused of more IP theft: 13 August 2008

ARTICLE: ENERTAG PATENTS: MORE ROYAL DUTCH SHELL IP CHICANERY?: 4 November 2009

ARTICLE: Shell investigates alleged IP theft at Geelong Refinery: 21 April 2012

ARTICLE: Another alleged case of IP theft hits Royal Dutch Shell: 20 May 2012

ARTICLE: Shell Oil Must Pay $153.6 Mln Award to Union Carbide: 17 June 2012

Some years ago extensive documentary evidence was brought to the attention of Malcolm Brinded above, when he was Chairman of Shell UK, proving beyond any doubt that Shell executives had conspired to rig a tender for a major contract. A number of innocent firms were deliberately lured into signing confidentiality agreements and disclosing Intellectual Property to Shell under false pretences, in a carefully contrived plot. The firm which was awarded the contract never took part in the tender. One objective of the Machiavellian plan was to stop/delay IP trade secrets owned by the participants in the tender from being disclosed to Shell's rivals. This was achieved by outright deception, without paying a cent to the firms involved, who wrongly believed they were participating in an honest tender. Instead of sacking the ring leader, AJL - who had a personal relationship with the firm which miraculously won the race in which it never ran - Shell senior directors, including Brinded, gave AJL their full backing. Some of the Shell executives involved, including for example, Tim Hannagan, still hold high positions inside Shell - in his case, Global Brand and Visual Identity Manager. If Shell does not accept that this is a true, provable account of what happened, then it should sue for libel. How on earth is such predatory conduct compatible with Shell's claimed business principles?

FOR MORE INFORMATION, READ THIS ARTICLE:

ARTICLE: Irregularities in a Royal Dutch Shell tender process: 31 October 2011

ARTICLE: SEX, DRUGS & CORRUPTION SPONSORED BY SHELL

June 27th, 2004:

Taipei Times: Former chairman of Royal/Dutch Shell gets giant payout: ‘after an accounting scandal’

Share this:

Like this:

ChannelNewsAsia.com: Embattled Shell braces for shareholder showdown

“officers and directors of these interconnected companies have hidden behind an opaque and complicated corporate structure to falsify proved oil and gas reserves for nearly 10 years”

Share this:

Like this:

Mail on Sunday: Shell board braced for revolt

Patrick Tooher,

Share this:

Like this:

Sunday Times: Shell told to hurry up on transparency

Share this:

Like this:

The Sunday Telegraph: Shell heads for shareholder defeat on director responsibility

Share this:

Like this:

The Observer: Ethical funds dump Shell shares

Share this:

Like this:

The Observer: A pearl in Shell?

Share this:

Like this:

The Observer: Shell shock

Share this:

Like this:

Economic Times: Watchdog lawyer sues Shell, execs over reserves

Share this:

Like this:

The Independent: Shareholders to strike new blow against Shell directors

Share this:

Like this:

Meta

DISCLAIMER

SHELL’S ROLE IN NIGERIAN OPL 245 BRIBERY SCANDAL

John Donovan’s ebooks

SHELL “CLOAK AND DAGGER” ACTIVITIES

SHELL PERSECUTION OF DR JOHN HUONG

SHELL SAKHALIN2 DEBACLE

NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL

SHELL ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS

SHELL IP PIRACY

WEBSITE INFORMATION

SHELL’S $500,000 WEDDING GIFT TO CORRUPT BRUNEI ROYAL FAMILY

BILL CAMPBELL WHISTLEBLOWER EMAIL TO MP’S

SHELL RESERVES FRAUD

by John Donovan

SHELL CONTROVERSIES

OVER 500 EXTERNAL PUBLICATIONS CITING OUR SHELL WEBSITES

SHELL'S FAILED $24 BILLION BET ON US SHALE

MADE REDUNDANT AND ROBBED OF TAX BREAKS BY SHELL

JOHN DONOVAN, THE OWNER OF THIS AND SEVERAL OTHER SHELL FOCUSSED WEBSITES

SHELL PRELUDE TO DISASTER

SHELL/EXXON INDUCED DUTCH EARTHQUAKES

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL TAX AVOIDANCE

SHELL’S EVIL ROLE IN THE “JUDICIAL MURDER” OF KEN SARO-WIWA

SHELL “SCREW-UP” IN THE ARCTIC – $7BN DOWN THE DRAIN

NAZI NAMED SHIP HIRED BY SHELL

Recent Comments

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL EMPLOYEE DATA BREACH

SHELL PROPPED UP APARTHEID

SHELL OFFICIAL ENDORSEMENT OF THIS WEBSITE

SHELL TOXIC BRANDS

DOMAIN NAME BATTLE

...WHY SHELL DOESN'T LOVE JOHN DONOVAN

Links

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL EVIL TRACK RECORD

ROYAL DUTCH SHELL INFORMATION

Archives

Categories

Links

Royal Dutch Shell Group .com Cookies Policy