News and information on Shell PLC
SAM MASTERS: Sunday 08 September 2013
For five years a London law firm and Anglo-Dutch oil giant have argued over reparations for one of the world’s worst spills in Africa’s oil heartland. But now, as fishing villages on the banks of the Niger Delta continue to count the cost of the leaks, compensation claims are finally due to be settled.
Royal Dutch Shell will tomorrow seek to reach an “acceptable agreement” with inhabitants of the cluster of Nigerian fishing villages over claims their livelihoods were ruined by the spills in 2008.
The compensation talks, which could reportedly cost Shell £100m, start in Port Harcourt – the capital of Nigeria’s southern Rivers state and the centre of Africa’s oil industry. Should a multimillion-pound settlement be reached, it could set a precedent for payouts in developing, but oil rich, nations.
Some 15,000 residents of the villages in the Bodo community are seeking compensation. The London law firm Leigh Day, which is representing the Nigerians, estimates that up to 600,000 barrels was spilled into the waters over 100 days.
Shell disputes that figure and the amount of damage caused, but admitted liability in 2011 for the spills. The oil firm estimates that 4,100 barrels were leaked.
According to the United Nations, the spill left at least 10 Ogoni communities with drinking water contaminated by “high levels of hydrocarbons” and the public health “seriously threatened”. In Nisisioken Ogale, in western Ogoniland, people were drinking water from wells contaminated with benzene at levels 900 times those of World Health Organisation guidelines.
“The oil industry has been a key sector of the Nigerian economy for over 50 years, but many Nigerians have paid a high price,” said Achim Steiner, the UN environment programme executive director, in 2011.
But two years after the UN said trust needed to be built and action taken to remedy the “multiple health and sustainable development issues”, no agreement has been reached. Shell said there was a “very limited” chance of a resolution as recently as last month. But on Friday a spokesman was more positive. “We’re hopeful that an acceptable agreement can be reached with the Bodo during next week’s negotiations.”
Leigh Day’s position that “no clean-up work has begun” is disputed by Shell. According to Leigh Day, much of the oil that leaked into waterways around the Bodo and Niger Delta is yet to be cleared.
The Nigerians’ lawyer, Martyn Day, last week described Shell’s clean-up efforts as “pitiful”. He said some 1,000 hectares of mangrove swamps were destroyed and another 5,000 hectares affected. Mr Day said: “We will be doing our damnedest to ensure Shell pays out a fair amount for the damage they have caused, and put the Bodo Creek back into its pre-spill state.” He added: “It is entirely depressing that one of the largest companies in the world is acting like the playground bully, trying to batter local people, whose lives have been devastated, into submission.”
Shell said it hoped a deal would be reached to provide “fair compensation, as well as a way forward on cleaning up the entire area affected by oil spills”. The oil company, which described the 2008 spills as “highly regrettable” and blamed corrosion to a pipeline, said it sought “resolution, not recrimination” tomorrow.
The Nigerian environmentalist and activist Nnimmo Bassey welcomed the talks, but added that Shell needed to clean up the spill. “More important is a clean-up of the mess, the pollution, so that the fishermen and farmers can have their means of livelihood back,” he said.
Posted in: Africa, Environment, Human Rights, Litigation, Nigeria, Ogoniland, Oil, Pollution, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, The Independent, Toxic contamination.
Tagged: Litigation · Niger Delta · Nigeria · Oil · Royal Dutch Shell Plc
This is not a Shell website. That fact should be abundantly plain from the overall content of this home page and our sister Shell-focussed websites, including shellnazihistory.com. Click on the Disclaimer link at top of this page for more information. You Can Be Sure Shell does not endorse or approve of this website. There are no subscription charges nor do we solicit or accept donations. It is an entirely free to use website drawing attention to the negative side of Shell while also publishing positive news about the company. The Shell logo image with the white text used on this website, as per the above example, is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. It can be found on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Our shellenergy.website publishes Shell Energy customer complaints posted on Trustpilot where there is an ample supply. Use this link for Shell’s own website.
EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA – HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
See our link list of over 500 articles by the FT, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, Dow Jones Newswires, New York Times, CNBC etc, plus UK House of Commons Select Committee Hansard records, information on U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission website etc. all containing references to our Shell focussed websites, or our website founders Alfred and John Donovan. Includes TV documentary features in English and German, newspaper and magazine articles, radio interviews, newsletters etc. Plus academic papers, Stratfor intelligence reports and UK, U.S. and Australian state/parliamentary publications, also citing our Shell websites. Click on this link to see the entire list, all in date order with a link to an index of over 100 books also containing references to our websites and/or our activities.
John Donovan, the website owner
A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
MARKETWATCH.COM ARTICLE: Shell’s Voser regrets U.S. shale bet, Arctic fail: 13 March 2013
FINANCIAL TIMES ARTICLE: Shell takes impairment on North America as profit slides: 1 October 2013
FINANCIAL TIMES ARTICLE: Peter Voser says he regrets Shell’s huge bet on US shale: 6 October 2013
ZEROHEDGE.COM: About That Shale Oil & Gas Miracle: 7 October 2013
POWERSOURCE/POST-GAZETTE ARTICLE: Shell to restructure shale assets in U.S.: 13 March 2014
Shell cuts spending and jobs at US shale gas arm: 13 March 2014
OILPRICE.COM ARTICLE: Shell's American Woes Highlight Difficulty of Cracking Shale: 13 March 2014
JEREMYLEGGETT.NET ARTICLE: Shale fracking is a ‘ponzi scheme’, ‘….equivalent of the dot.com crash’: 19 September 2014
SEEKINGALPHA.COM ARTICLE: Chevron A Safer Bet Than Shell: 13 April 2015
© 2024 Royal Dutch Shell Group .com | Powered by WordPress
A WordPress theme by Ravi Varma