EMAIL RECEIVED FROM A MEMBER OF THE “ROSSPORT FIVE” (WITH REPLY COMMENT NOW RECEIVED FROM OSSL)
Hi, John
I am one of the Rossport 5.
I have followed the stream of detail on your web-site from OSSL in their exposé of gardai and much/many more. Thank you.
Â
One very strange item or dynamic , and not highlighted so far:-   OSSL have named many people and items that they delivered on behalf of Shell, apart from the consignments of booze, and the alleged recipients or gifters have in no case denied the veracity of the allegations. Of course it is more difficult to deny the matter when the goods are in existence – sheep pens, cattle crushers, TV sets, houses painted etc – than in the case of consumer items such as alcohol which have a habit of leaving no physical evidence. Surely on balance and objectively, it is not likely that OSSL people are truthful in all cases where physical remains exist and are then not truthful in the one case where physical evidence by its very nature is missing?. It seems to me that in a civil case the veracity of OSSL would have to be accepted.