Earlier this month, Canada looked at the same issue: How hard would it be to clean up an oil spill in the Beaufort Sea, which straddles the border between the two countries. The answer? Really hard.
Even in the “summer” season between July and October, when Arctic drilling normally occurs, true open water without ice occurs only 54% to 88% of the time, even close to shore, according to the report, prepared for the National Energy Board by S.L. Ross Environmental Research Ltd. of Ottawa.
Conditions can be so bad that no ice cleanup measures are even possible about 20% of the time in June, 40% of the time in August and 65% of the time in October, said the report, which measured typical temperatures, wave heights and ice patterns and how they might prevent the use of such responses as in-situ burning, containment and application of dispersants.
After October, any active response would almost certainly deferred until the following melt season, the report said.
They said Shell’s assertion that it can recover 95% of any oil spilled in Arctic waters using mechanical containment devices is unrealistic, given a much lower rate of recovery during the recent spill in the Gulf of Mexico, and assumes conditions in August, not October, “when ice, darkness and bad weather prevail.”
Shell spokesman Curtis Smith said the company has shown its ability to clean up even more than the estimated worst-case volume of a potential spill. “Additionally, Shell remains committed to fabricating an oil spill capping system which is designed to capture hydrocarbons at the source in the extremely unlikely event of a shallow water blowout,” Smith said.
RELATED:
Drilling in Arctic waters? Scientists aren’t sure if it’s safe
Shell Alaska drops plan for offshore Arctic drilling this year
National monument status urged for Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
–Kim Murphy: August 4, 2011 | 5:30 pm
Photo: Arctic drilling rig at ConocoPhillips onshore Alpine field, on Alaska’s North Slope near the Beaufort Sea. Credit: ConocoPhillips.
Royal Dutch Shell conspired directly with Hitler, financed the Nazi Party, was anti-Semitic and sold out its own Dutch Jewish employees to the Nazis. Shell had a close relationship with the Nazis during and after the reign of Sir Henri Deterding, an ardent Nazi, and the founder and decades long leader of the Royal Dutch Shell Group. His burial ceremony, which had all the trappings of a state funeral, was held at his private estate in Mecklenburg, Germany. The spectacle (photographs below) included a funeral procession led by a horse drawn funeral hearse with senior Nazis officials and senior Royal Dutch Shell directors in attendance, Nazi salutes at the graveside, swastika banners on display and wreaths and personal tributes from Adolf Hitler and Reichsmarschall, Hermann Goring. Deterding was an honored associate and supporter of Hitler and a personal friend of Goring.
Deterding was the guest of Hitler during a four day summit meeting at Berchtesgaden. Sir Henri and Hitler both had ambitions on Russian oil fields. Only an honored personal guest would be rewarded with a private four day meeting at Hitler’s mountain top retreat.
IN JULY 2007, MR BILL CAMPBELL (ABOVE, A RETIRED GROUP AUDITOR OF SHELL INTERNATIONAL SENT AN EMAIL TO EVERY UK MP AND MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS: 
MORE DETAILS:
A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
