WWF advert attacks Shell’s claims
Wednesday August 13 2008 07:06 BST
By Mark Sweney
News and information on Royal Dutch Shell Group
Wednesday August 13 2008 07:06 BST
By Mark Sweney
WWF’s ad campaign will launch on giant digital screens at Waterloo station in London today trumpeting its victory by stating that “Shell can’t hide the environmental impact of their oil sand projects”.
The 20-second WWF ad accuses Shell of “greenwash” over a press ad in the Financial Times earlier this year suggesting the company’s Canadian oil sand extraction operation was sustainable.
In the Waterloo ad, WWF, which interspersed the copy with images of stripped mining landscape in Canada, claims that the Shell operation releases three times more greenhouse gases than conventional oil production. The Waterloo ad was created by the agency Kitcatt Nohr Alexander Shaw.
WWF lodged a complaint with the Advertising Standards Authority about a national press ad that Shell launched in the FT in February.
The ad opens with the headline “We invest today’s profits in tomorrow’s solutions”.
In the ad, Shell talks of the need to invest in technology to “continue to secure a profitable and sustainable future”.
Shell also said that in the race to find more energy to fuel global demand there was a need to “find new ways of managing carbon emissions to limit climate change”.
The FT ad gave examples included Shell building the biggest refinery in the US, “exploring a new generation of bio fuels”, and unlocking “the potential of the vast Canadian oil sands deposit”.
WWF complained to the ASA that Shell’s Canadian oil sand operation and building the biggest US refinery – actually an expanded redevelopment of an existing facility at Port Arthur in Texas – does not help provide a sustainable future or sustainable energy production.
Shell argued that to meet vast energy requirements it had to look beyond conventional sources of oil and gas, “but also the development of vast resources of unconventional oil and gas, such as oil sands”.
The ASA said that the use of the word “sustainable” throughout the ad was defined as “primarily in environmental terms”.
Because Shell had not provided evidence that it was “effectively” managing carbon emissions from its oil sands projects “in order to limit climate change”, the ASA deemed that the ad was misleading.
The ASA came to the same conclusion about Shell’s claims about the redevelopment of the Port Arthur oil refinery and said it should not be shown again in its current form.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/aug/13/advertising.asa
Posted in: Environment, Oil Sands, Wikipedia.
Tagged: Greenwashing · WWF
See our link list of over 500 articles by the FT, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, Dow Jones Newswires, New York Times, CNBC etc, plus UK House of Commons Select Committee Hansard records, information on U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission website etc. all containing references to our Shell focussed websites, or our website founders Alfred and John Donovan. Includes TV documentary features in English and German, newspaper and magazine articles, radio interviews, newsletters etc. Plus academic papers, Stratfor intelligence reports and UK, U.S. and Australian state/parliamentary publications, also citing our Shell websites. Click on this link to see the entire list, all in date order with a link to an index of over 100 books also containing references to our websites and/or our activities.
John Donovan, the website owner
A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
MARKETWATCH.COM ARTICLE: Shell’s Voser regrets U.S. shale bet, Arctic fail: 13 March 2013
FINANCIAL TIMES ARTICLE: Shell takes impairment on North America as profit slides: 1 October 2013
FINANCIAL TIMES ARTICLE: Peter Voser says he regrets Shell’s huge bet on US shale: 6 October 2013
ZEROHEDGE.COM: About That Shale Oil & Gas Miracle: 7 October 2013
POWERSOURCE/POST-GAZETTE ARTICLE: Shell to restructure shale assets in U.S.: 13 March 2014
Shell cuts spending and jobs at US shale gas arm: 13 March 2014
OILPRICE.COM ARTICLE: Shell's American Woes Highlight Difficulty of Cracking Shale: 13 March 2014
JEREMYLEGGETT.NET ARTICLE: Shale fracking is a ‘ponzi scheme’, ‘….equivalent of the dot.com crash’: 19 September 2014
SEEKINGALPHA.COM ARTICLE: Chevron A Safer Bet Than Shell: 13 April 2015
This is not a Shell website. That fact should be abundantly plain from the overall content of this home page and our sister Shell focussed websites, including shellnazihistory.com. Click on the Disclaimer link at top of this page for more information. You Can Be Sure Shell does not endorse or approve of this website. There are no subscription charges nor do we solicit or accept donations. It is an entirely free to use website drawing attention to the negative side of Shell while also publishing positive news about the company. The Shell logo image with the white text used on this website, as per the above example, is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. It can be found on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Our shellenergy.website publishes Shell Energy customer complaints posted on Trustpilot where there is an ample supply. Use this link for Shell’s own website.
EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA – HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
© 2022 Royal Dutch Shell Group .com | Powered by WordPress
PrimePress theme by Ravi Varma