By Roland Gribben (Filed: 30/01/2006)
Pressure is growing on the Government to end opposition to the creation of a new agency to control Britain's strategic oil stocks, amid worries about the future of the refinery business.
The Chancellor Gordon Brown has been reluctant to support the move because he is concerned the Government may end up being exposed to a huge financial obligation by effectively underwriting the oil stocks.
BP, Shell, Esso and independent oil companies along with importers and petrol retailers, including Tesco and Sainsbury, are attempting to persuade him to change his mind, and pointing out that by adopting the Stockholding Agency framework used in other EU states the Government will not be exposed to financial risk.
At present, oil reserves are held by oil companies without any cost to the Government, although Alan Johnson, Trade and Industry Secretary, is responsible for administering them.
Under existing rules BP, Shell and other oil majors with refineries in Britain are required to hold the equivalent of 67.5 days' sales while supermarkets and other non-refiners have a smaller 48.5 days' obligation.
Oil companies and supermarkets believe an agency would be better placed to administer stocks and ensure they were meeting obligations. They feel their arguments have been reinforced by confusion surrounding specific stocking requirements covering particular products.
One industry executive said: “It's very frustrating. We've been talking to the Government about setting up the agency for three years now and there's been little progress.”
The unity in the industry on the agency issue masks wide differences between the oil majors and supermarkets on other stocking and strategic issues. BP and Shell are pressing the DTI to end the stocking differential with supermarkets and refiners, arguing that Britain is the only EU country with a two-tier system.
They maintain the current set-up is anti-competitive, penalises domestic refineries, and will not survive changes in the industry or the longer-term need to fall in line with the EU's 90-day stock obligation. Britain has been given a dispensation because North Sea oil provides a “reserve cushion”, but as offshore production runs down stocks will need to rise.
Supermarkets, faced with a massive bill to bring them into line and anxious to protect their 33pc share of the petrol market, have mounted strong opposition to the move. They have told ministers that “big oil” is trying to shackle them and undermine their competitive position

















Royal Dutch Shell conspired directly with Hitler, financed the Nazi Party, was anti-Semitic and sold out its own Dutch Jewish employees to the Nazis. Shell had a close relationship with the Nazis during and after the reign of Sir Henri Deterding, an ardent Nazi, and the founder and decades long leader of the Royal Dutch Shell Group. His burial ceremony, which had all the trappings of a state funeral, was held at his private estate in Mecklenburg, Germany. The spectacle (photographs below) included a funeral procession led by a horse drawn funeral hearse with senior Nazis officials and senior Royal Dutch Shell directors in attendance, Nazi salutes at the graveside, swastika banners on display and wreaths and personal tributes from Adolf Hitler and Reichsmarschall, Hermann Goring. Deterding was an honored associate and supporter of Hitler and a personal friend of Goring.
Deterding was the guest of Hitler during a four day summit meeting at Berchtesgaden. Sir Henri and Hitler both had ambitions on Russian oil fields. Only an honored personal guest would be rewarded with a private four day meeting at Hitler’s mountain top retreat.














IN JULY 2007, MR BILL CAMPBELL (ABOVE, A RETIRED GROUP AUDITOR OF SHELL INTERNATIONAL SENT AN EMAIL TO EVERY UK MP AND MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS:


MORE DETAILS:












A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.

























































