Minneapolis Star Tribune: Court to consider gasoline price-fixing case
Associated Press
June 27, 2005
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court said Monday it would consider whether to dismiss a lawsuit accusing ChevronTexaco Corp. and Shell Oil Co. of improperly inflating gas prices in the late 1990s.
Justices will review a lower court ruling that allowed the class-action lawsuit by 23,000 gas station owners to proceed. The lawsuit accuses Shell and Texaco of setting up two joint ventures in 1998 to illegally fix gas prices.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit of Appeals ruled the suit should go to trial because of evidence suggesting the venture unfairly restrained trade.
The court noted that when crude oil was at historic lows of $10 to $12 per barrel, the ventures increased the Shell and Texaco brands by 40 cents per gallon in Los Angeles and by 30 cents in Seattle and Portland, Ore.
The ventures, Motiva Enterprises and Equilon Enterprises, operated from 1998 to 2001, when Texaco sold its stake to win approval of its purchase of Chevron. During that time, however, Texaco and Shell continued to maintain separate brand names and competed for customers “at the pump,” according to the ruling.
In a dissent, Judge Ferdinand Fernandez said the ventures were legitimate because they were approved by the Federal Trade Commission and several state attorneys general.
“What could be more integral to the running of a business than setting a price for its goods and services?” Fernandez wrote.
Backing ChevronTexaco and Shell Oil in the appeal were the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and major corporations such as Coca-Cola Co. and Microsoft Corp. They argue in filings that routine pricing decisions by joint ventures would be constantly challenged in court if the lower ruling is allowed to stand.
Lawyers for the gas station operators say distributors paid $1 billion or more in excessive charges, which they will seek to recoup. However, while the distributors passed the alleged excess costs to consumers, consumers wouldn’t necessarily be eligible for refunds.
The cases are Texaco v. Dagher, 04-805 and Shell Oil v. Dagher, 04-814. Arguments will be heard in the court’s next term beginning in October.
This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.
Royal Dutch Shell conspired directly with Hitler, financed the Nazi Party, was anti-Semitic and sold out its own Dutch Jewish employees to the Nazis. Shell had a close relationship with the Nazis during and after the reign of Sir Henri Deterding, an ardent Nazi, and the founder and decades long leader of the Royal Dutch Shell Group. His burial ceremony, which had all the trappings of a state funeral, was held at his private estate in Mecklenburg, Germany. The spectacle (photographs below) included a funeral procession led by a horse drawn funeral hearse with senior Nazis officials and senior Royal Dutch Shell directors in attendance, Nazi salutes at the graveside, swastika banners on display and wreaths and personal tributes from Adolf Hitler and Reichsmarschall, Hermann Goring. Deterding was an honored associate and supporter of Hitler and a personal friend of Goring.
Deterding was the guest of Hitler during a four day summit meeting at Berchtesgaden. Sir Henri and Hitler both had ambitions on Russian oil fields. Only an honored personal guest would be rewarded with a private four day meeting at Hitler’s mountain top retreat.
IN JULY 2007, MR BILL CAMPBELL (ABOVE, A RETIRED GROUP AUDITOR OF SHELL INTERNATIONAL SENT AN EMAIL TO EVERY UK MP AND MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS: 
MORE DETAILS:
A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
