LETTER FROM MALCOLM BRINDED (RIGHT) PUBLISHED BY THE FINANCIAL TIMES
From Mr Malcolm Brinded.
Sir, Jürgen Grossman, RWEs chief executive, makes some important points in articulating the scale of the challenge involved in reducing the carbon footprint of energy production (Germany faces Herculean task with move to renewables, Special Reports, Energy, December 5). But reconciling economic growth and climate change is not a straight choice between nuclear and renewables. As a result of recent major increases in the global estimates of natural gas resources, energy policymakers should now be confident that they can count on abundant, affordable and acceptable natural gas today and for many decades to come. This is why Angela Merkel is right when she outlines a central role for gas in Germanys new energy future.
Chancellor Merkels analysis should resonate across Europe and the rest of the world. Over the next 40 years, the world will need twice as much energy, but with half the carbon emissions. The simplest, fastest and cheapest way to achieve this will be for gas to displace coal in power generation in the next 20 years. Europe has the potential to lead the world here, because switching to gas-fired power generation would cut emissions now.
Modern gas-fired power plants emit approximately 50 per cent less carbon dioxide than coal plants. Europe is within economic distance of 70 per cent of the worlds gas reserves and has a well-established gas infrastructure. Whats more, a switch to gas wouldnt come at the expense of renewable energy. Fear among non-governmental organisations and politicians that a stronger focus on natural gas will lock in another generation of fossil fuel plants and drive out investment in renewables misses the point. The flexibility of gas power is the natural complement to the intermittency of renewables.
And as for historic security of supply concerns, we now see many new countries exporting gas, plus much increased capacity to import liquefied natural gas into Europe all of which creates a much more resilient supply situation.
Governments and regulators worldwide must acknowledge, welcome and encourage the role that gas can play in the future energy mix, through energy and power market policies that properly recognise the CO2 benefits, reliability and flexibility of gas power.
7 December 2011
Malcolm Brinded, Executive Director, Upstream International Royal Dutch Shell, London SE1, UK
This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.
Royal Dutch Shell conspired directly with Hitler, financed the Nazi Party, was anti-Semitic and sold out its own Dutch Jewish employees to the Nazis. Shell had a close relationship with the Nazis during and after the reign of Sir Henri Deterding, an ardent Nazi, and the founder and decades long leader of the Royal Dutch Shell Group. His burial ceremony, which had all the trappings of a state funeral, was held at his private estate in Mecklenburg, Germany. The spectacle (photographs below) included a funeral procession led by a horse drawn funeral hearse with senior Nazis officials and senior Royal Dutch Shell directors in attendance, Nazi salutes at the graveside, swastika banners on display and wreaths and personal tributes from Adolf Hitler and Reichsmarschall, Hermann Goring. Deterding was an honored associate and supporter of Hitler and a personal friend of Goring.
Deterding was the guest of Hitler during a four day summit meeting at Berchtesgaden. Sir Henri and Hitler both had ambitions on Russian oil fields. Only an honored personal guest would be rewarded with a private four day meeting at Hitler’s mountain top retreat.
IN JULY 2007, MR BILL CAMPBELL (ABOVE, A RETIRED GROUP AUDITOR OF SHELL INTERNATIONAL SENT AN EMAIL TO EVERY UK MP AND MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS: 
MORE DETAILS:
A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
