The oil giant is finally making enough cash to pay its dividends and cut debt. But it’s yet to show that it can boost returns while shifting to renewables.
Royal Dutch Shell Plc appears at first glance to have arrived at its destination. The Anglo-Dutch oil major made enough cash last year to pay its dividends and cut debt, seemingly confounding skeptics who feared the payout would need to be cut. But this isn’t yet a sustainable performance. Shell is still traveling.
The company’s dividend yield hit about 9 percent in 2015 as falling oil prices and the acquisition of BG Group, funded partly by debt, sowed doubts over whether the payout was affordable. Shell has since cut costs and capital expenditure and brought new production on stream. Add an oil price recovery and the group generated $53 billion of operating cash flow last year. That left it able to fund $14 billion of capital spending and other investments, net of disposals, and a $20 billion bill for interest payments and dividends.
Shell has used the surplus cash to cut debt and buy back its own shares. Net borrowings of $51 billion at the end of the fourth quarter are down from nearly $80 billion in the aftermath of the BG takeover and stood at 20 percent of total capital, Shell’s target.
Job done? Not so fast. This is still only a snapshot, rather than sustained proof. The debt reduction was aided by a huge boost from working capital movements in the last three months of 2018. The volatility in Shell’s working capital as inventories jump around is one reason why investors can’t be sure just yet that the company’s leverage will stay at or below the threshold.
The average price for Brent crude in the fourth quarter was about $69 per barrel. It is around $62 currently. While Shell could have afforded its cash dividends for 2018 had the oil price averaged out at that lower level over the whole year, it’s hard to be confident about crude’s buoyancy right now.
And despite Shell’s progress, its 7.6 percent return on average capital employed was below its estimated cost of capital and its 10 percent target. The company simply isn’t earning enough.
The fixation has been on getting Shell’s financials in shape by 2020. It looks on track to achieve that even if the latest results aren’t the last word. The bigger strategic issue remains unresolved: Shell’s needed long-term transformation into a company that produces more of its energy from sustainable sources. Management pay is now being linked in part to environmental targets, which is something.
Investors clearly harbor doubts that this all hangs together. Shell’s dividend yield is still 6 percent, the eleventh highest in the FTSE 100. No doubt, management can always find more cost cuts and disposals to channel cash to shareholders. But doing this while generating higher returns and investing in renewables is a brainteaser yet to be solved.
This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.royaldutchshellplc.com and its sister websites royaldutchshellgroup.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, shellnews.net, shell2004.com, shellshareholders.org, don-marketing.com and cybergriping.com are all owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia article: royaldutchshellplc.com