
You may be a winner as fuel costs fall, but pity the loser

News and information on Royal Dutch Shell Group
The 13 Opec oil ministers who gathered in Vienna last night could be forgiven for being tetchier than usual. To satisfy delegates observing Ramadan, the main session did not start until 9pm and the final press conference until 1.30am.
Not only were delegates likely to be bleary-eyed, many were dissatisfied for another reason: a more than 30 per cent price slide since July.
While ordinary consumers are delighted by falling petrol prices, others view it with dismay. Governments of oil-exporting countries, including many of the Gulf states, Venezuela, Nigeria, Russia and Norway, rely heavily on the proceeds of their oil industries to meet public spending.
Even the Treasury benefits from higher oil prices through its tax take on the North Sea, although it tends to undermine tax revenues from other sources so the overall impact on the UK is more complex.
Oil-exporting governments and their sovereign wealth funds are not alone in preferring higher oil prices. Shareholders in oil companies such as Shell and BP, both of which made record profits this year as prices soared, are obvious losers with lower prices, as are millions of ordinary British pension-holders. Suppliers to the industry builders of rigs and support equipment stand to lose. Those that rely indirectly on oil wealth, such as construction groups, hoteliers and suppliers of luxury goods, face leaner times.
Of course, everything is relative. Research from McKinsey indicates that, with oil prices at $100 a barrel, Gulf states stand to scoop a windfall of about $9 trillion by 2020. At $50 per barrel, that falls to $4.7 trillion.
The number of winners from falling oil prices outstrips the number of losers. Any company involved in the production and transport of goods over long distances – virtually every manufacturing industry as well as farmers, food producers and retailers. Central bankers have welcomed the slide in oil prices because it eases the pressure on them to maintain high interest rates to contain inflation.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article4720123.ece
Posted in: The Times.
See our link list of over 500 articles by the FT, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Bloomberg, Forbes, Dow Jones Newswires, New York Times, CNBC etc, plus UK House of Commons Select Committee Hansard records, information on U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission website etc. all containing references to our Shell focussed websites, or our website founders Alfred and John Donovan. Includes TV documentary features in English and German, newspaper and magazine articles, radio interviews, newsletters etc. Plus academic papers, Stratfor intelligence reports and UK, U.S. and Australian state/parliamentary publications, also citing our Shell websites. Click on this link to see the entire list, all in date order with a link to an index of over 100 books also containing references to our websites and/or our activities.
John Donovan, the website owner
A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
MARKETWATCH.COM ARTICLE: Shell’s Voser regrets U.S. shale bet, Arctic fail: 13 March 2013
FINANCIAL TIMES ARTICLE: Shell takes impairment on North America as profit slides: 1 October 2013
FINANCIAL TIMES ARTICLE: Peter Voser says he regrets Shell’s huge bet on US shale: 6 October 2013
ZEROHEDGE.COM: About That Shale Oil & Gas Miracle: 7 October 2013
POWERSOURCE/POST-GAZETTE ARTICLE: Shell to restructure shale assets in U.S.: 13 March 2014
Shell cuts spending and jobs at US shale gas arm: 13 March 2014
OILPRICE.COM ARTICLE: Shell's American Woes Highlight Difficulty of Cracking Shale: 13 March 2014
JEREMYLEGGETT.NET ARTICLE: Shale fracking is a ‘ponzi scheme’, ‘….equivalent of the dot.com crash’: 19 September 2014
SEEKINGALPHA.COM ARTICLE: Chevron A Safer Bet Than Shell: 13 April 2015
This is not a Shell website. That fact should be abundantly plain from the overall content of this home page and our sister Shell focussed websites, including shellnazihistory.com. Click on the Disclaimer link at top of this page for more information. You Can Be Sure Shell does not endorse or approve of this website. There are no subscription charges nor do we solicit or accept donations. It is an entirely free to use website drawing attention to the negative side of Shell while also publishing positive news about the company. The Shell logo image with the white text used on this website, as per the above example, is in the public domain because its copyright has expired and its author is anonymous. It can be found on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Our shellenergy.website publishes Shell Energy customer complaints posted on Trustpilot where there is an ample supply. Use this link for Shell’s own website.
EBOOK TITLE: “SIR HENRI DETERDING AND THE NAZI HISTORY OF ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON
EBOOK TITLE: “JOHN DONOVAN, SHELL’S NIGHTMARE: MY EPIC FEUD WITH THE UNSCRUPULOUS OIL GIANT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
EBOOK TITLE: “TOXIC FACTS ABOUT SHELL REMOVED FROM WIKIPEDIA – HOW SHELL BECAME THE MOST HATED BRAND IN THE WORLD” – AVAILABLE ON AMAZON.
© 2022 Royal Dutch Shell Group .com | Powered by WordPress
PrimePress theme by Ravi Varma