Royal Dutch Shell Group .com Rotating Header Image

Paddy Briggs replies to Professor Alan J. Cohen, University of Louisiana-Lafayette: the possibility of BP Shell merger

1. July 5th, 2007 11:06

Thank you for your response. I totally agree that the staff implications of a merger are paramount. Both corporations have fine staff – arguably their most valuable assets. Shell was rather cavalier in letting staff go (even very skilled and experienced people in the upstream) on cost grounds some years ago. They paid the price and have been very actively recruiting over the past couple of years or so. One of the benefits of a Shell/BP merger must be a degree of rationalisation throughout the organisation and no doubt a combine Shell/BP would require many fewer staff at all levels than two separate companies.

As far as pensioners are concerned I certainly agree. I am active in the Shell Pensioner world on various fronts and if a merger does come about I will be fighting hard to protect the interests of the Shell pensioner community here in the UK. Concerns about Pensions are in the forefront of comments about the other current Anglo Dutch corporation merger in the news at the moment (ICI and Akzo). Here is what the FT reported:

“Pension trustees are insisting on a central role in any takeover talks between the UK chemicals group and Akzo Nobel, the Dutch conglomerate. The demand came yesterday as ICI rejected a takeover proposal from Akzo valued at £7.2bn. A spokesman for ICI’s pension trustees said: “We would have expected to have an early and direct conversation… “

Paddy Briggs

This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.

Comments are closed.