Thursday, March 16, 2006. Issue 3372. Page 5.
Aa Aa Aa
Bloomberg
Royal Dutch Shell and its partners developing a multibillion dollar oil and gas project in the Far East should be denied funding by Eastern Europe's biggest lender because it's causing ecological damage, activists said.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development should not give loans as the Sakhalin-2 liquefied natural gas project endangers the island's wildlife, waterways and inhabitants, ecologists including Igor Chestin, chief executive officer of the Russian branch of the World Wildlife Fund, said in Moscow.
Environmentalists maintain the project, whose costs doubled last year and which is now estimated to be worth around $20 billion, threatens the world's last 100 western gray whales by disturbing their feeding grounds.
A decision by the EBRD to fund the Shell-led project may help the venture raise at least $4 billion, the bank and Sakhalin regional authorities have said.
The initial hearing was held on Feb. 28 in London.
If the EBRD balks at providing financing for the venture, which includes Mitsui & Co. and Mitsubishi, it may convince other lenders, such as the Japan Bank for International Cooperation to withhold billions of dollars in loans for the project.
“The EBRD plays a lead role in a group of potential public lenders,” including JBIC and the U.S. Export-Import Bank, the London-based bank said last month on its web site.
The EBRD is holding a series of public consultations on the Sakhalin-2 project. The bank will hold sessions at Sakhalin island, off the Pacific coast, next week and later in Sapporo, Japan.
Work by Sakhalin Energy Investment, the project operator, was not perfect “but much better than a year ago,” said Jeffrey Jeter, an EBRD environment adviser. “We recognize the issues, the company recognizes the issues,” he said. “Our end analysis is that they've been addressed.”
The venture, which was originally supposed to cost $10 billion, is aiming to supply fuel to the United States and Asia. A LNG plant is scheduled to be completed on Sakhalin next year.

















Royal Dutch Shell conspired directly with Hitler, financed the Nazi Party, was anti-Semitic and sold out its own Dutch Jewish employees to the Nazis. Shell had a close relationship with the Nazis during and after the reign of Sir Henri Deterding, an ardent Nazi, and the founder and decades long leader of the Royal Dutch Shell Group. His burial ceremony, which had all the trappings of a state funeral, was held at his private estate in Mecklenburg, Germany. The spectacle (photographs below) included a funeral procession led by a horse drawn funeral hearse with senior Nazis officials and senior Royal Dutch Shell directors in attendance, Nazi salutes at the graveside, swastika banners on display and wreaths and personal tributes from Adolf Hitler and Reichsmarschall, Hermann Goring. Deterding was an honored associate and supporter of Hitler and a personal friend of Goring.
Deterding was the guest of Hitler during a four day summit meeting at Berchtesgaden. Sir Henri and Hitler both had ambitions on Russian oil fields. Only an honored personal guest would be rewarded with a private four day meeting at Hitler’s mountain top retreat.














IN JULY 2007, MR BILL CAMPBELL (ABOVE, A RETIRED GROUP AUDITOR OF SHELL INTERNATIONAL SENT AN EMAIL TO EVERY UK MP AND MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS:


MORE DETAILS:












A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.

























































