When Shell announced that it was planning to buy BG Group last month, opposition to the deal started to build immediately.
By Rupert Hargreaves – Tuesday, 26 May, 2015
Extracts
I’m always on the lookout for companies that are not acting in the best interests of shareholders.
Indeed, as shareholders are ultimately owners of the businesses they invest in, management teams should, at all times, act in the best interests of shareholders.
But in many cases, management ignores this fundamental goal.
And there are signs that Gulf Keystone Petroleum and Shell’s executives have made this fatal mistake.
Not impressed
When Shell announced that it was planning to buy BG Group last month, opposition to the deal started to build immediately.
And over the past 30 days it has become increasingly apparent that the market does not support Shell’s decision to buy its smaller peer. For example, over the past 30 days Shell’s shares have fallen by 5.7%, underperforming the FTSE 100 by 4.6% and the wider oil & gas producers sector by 1.7%.
Over the same period, BG has only underperformed by 1.0%.
Long-term drag
The market is concerned that Shell is overpaying for BG. Shell’s offer is essentially an enormous multi-billion dollar bet on the price of oil.
If the oil price recovers, the deal will make sense. However, if the price of oil continues to languish, as many forecasters are predicting, the BG acquisition could prove to be a drag on Shell’s earnings for years to come.
What’s more, BG is trying to grapple with numerous operations problems. Including concerns within Egypt and to production problems within Brazil. Also, the company is exposed to the Petrobras scandal, as Petrobras is BG’s primary partner in Brazil.
Petrobras issue
As Brazil’s state oil company, Petrobras takes a stake in almost all of the country’s oil & gas projects. So, BG has to work closely with the group.
Petrobras is the sole operator of five pre-salt oilfields in the Santos Basin, offshore Brazil. BG has a stake in each of these five fields, all of which are highly sought after assets.
Unfortunately, this exposes BG to Petrobras’s troubles. There are concerns that Petrobras won’t be able to fulfil its obligations to BG due to its on-going corruption scandal.
Without Petrobras’ support, BG’s Brazilian assets could become a thorn in the company’s side.
Burning cash
The market is concerned that Shell is wasting time and money on its acquisition of BG.
This website and sisters royaldutchshellplc.com, shellnazihistory.com, royaldutchshell.website, johndonovan.website, and shellnews.net, are owned by John Donovan. There is also a Wikipedia segment.
Royal Dutch Shell conspired directly with Hitler, financed the Nazi Party, was anti-Semitic and sold out its own Dutch Jewish employees to the Nazis. Shell had a close relationship with the Nazis during and after the reign of Sir Henri Deterding, an ardent Nazi, and the founder and decades long leader of the Royal Dutch Shell Group. His burial ceremony, which had all the trappings of a state funeral, was held at his private estate in Mecklenburg, Germany. The spectacle (photographs below) included a funeral procession led by a horse drawn funeral hearse with senior Nazis officials and senior Royal Dutch Shell directors in attendance, Nazi salutes at the graveside, swastika banners on display and wreaths and personal tributes from Adolf Hitler and Reichsmarschall, Hermann Goring. Deterding was an honored associate and supporter of Hitler and a personal friend of Goring.
Deterding was the guest of Hitler during a four day summit meeting at Berchtesgaden. Sir Henri and Hitler both had ambitions on Russian oil fields. Only an honored personal guest would be rewarded with a private four day meeting at Hitler’s mountain top retreat.
IN JULY 2007, MR BILL CAMPBELL (ABOVE, A RETIRED GROUP AUDITOR OF SHELL INTERNATIONAL SENT AN EMAIL TO EVERY UK MP AND MEMBER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS: 
MORE DETAILS:
A head-cut image of Alfred Donovan (now deceased) appears courtesy of The Wall Street Journal.
